A friend forward an interesting piece of information. It clearly indicates the rapid growth of RSS since the launch of which supports viewing RSS as well as . It comes from Nielsen//NetRatings related to the product. So how much growth? 5%? 10%. Over 10% is really moving. Is rapid 15%? How about 25%?
So from the email they sent out:
Yahoo! News Restatement - May 10, 2007
We have determined a URL coded to the Yahoo! News definition (rss.news.yahoo.com) should be removed from the reporting data beginning with April 2007. The URL contributed traffic to Yahoo! News throughout the past 13 months (March 2006 - 2007) - providing a small amount of incremental Unique Audience for the Channel (2-3%) but, in recent months, contributing as much as 20-25% of the page views and time spent. We will be reposting the data within the Trend Report in the near future. In the interim, please contact your Sales or Client Service Representative to receive an offline correction file across all Standard Metrics.
The domain (rss.news.yahoo.com) is where Yahoo runs all their RSS feeds . What this indicates is people using RSS are driving an increasing number of page views and time spent around the content. Not clear if it’s in the feed itself or on the actual web site. Likely on the web site. Regardless, a clear indicator of the not only the adoption of RSS but the actual usage of the feed’s content.
Added on: May 14, 2007 with feedback from 3 folks
Tagged as: attention , page views , rss , syndication , time spent , usage ,
Add to: | |
I love this time of the year. All the great match ups and amazing endings. There is so much hype especially around the (March Madness on Demand). Something seems to be missing. How about using or (Outlook 2003 folks need a .) feeds to update fans about their favorite teams schedule, the schedule for entire conference, or all the games? Well, you are in luck. provides the addicted college hoops fan with RSS feeds or Calendar feeds for individual teams, conferences, regions, dates, or the entire schedule.
You can create as many feeds as you like. One for a conference, a couple of teams, and for a specific day. It’s up to you. First select the type (Team, Date, Conference, Venue, Seed, Region). Based on the selection, the second drop-down will change to reflect the appropriate options. Hit “Go” and the feed will be available below. Then subscribe to the the feed (using Add This) and/or feed (copy and paste into or click the link button for ). The feed contains the teams playing, approximate tip-off time (all EDT but should show up in your calendar correctly based on your time zone), and venue. As the tournament progresses, the feeds will be updated automatically. For a team feed, there next game, time, and foe will be added to the calendar… if they win
. Same is true for the RSS feed.
This is just one example of what I talked about in a previous blog post (under Syndicate IQ) about the feed is the story. The Dallas Morning News had a feed for everything related to the Rita and Katrina hurricanes. A “Story Feed” can contain not only breaking news but video/audio reports, community reaction, volunteer needs, traffic and weather advisories, and much more. I help put together as a proof of concept to show what can be done to help folks organize and maintain the flow of information related to an event spanning multiple days/weeks. And for some, to keep up with their addiction.
Enjoy!
NOTE: Google calendar and our iCal feeds are not playing nice. We will get it figure out. Be patient. We put this together in less then 3 days (quarter-time) using Rails.
Added on: March 14, 2007 with feedback from 1 folks
Tagged as: college basketball , feeds , final four , ical , icalendar , icalendar , march madness , rss , syndication ,
Add to: | |
So I did a search on Google - . The number 1 and 2 article was an interview I did with Rok of and Dick from . That is crazy. There has been nothing so new as to something we argued about over 2 years ago. By the way, is using search marketing. Nice job!
Feedbuner has two primary measures (and I believe has something similar):
Subscribers (which use to be called “circulation") is defined as:
an approximate measure of the number of individuals currently subscribed to a feed. ( ).
Reach (which is not the same as web reach) is defined as:
the total number of people who have taken action - viewed or clicked - on the content in your feed. ( )
It measures activity from subscribers AND people who don’t subscriber. Here is one where twice as many people, that includes the subscribers, interacted with the feed’s content which are mostly clicks back to the web site. So how does a publisher determine the number of subscribers consistently reading their content. And from an advertiser prospective, is the “reach” calculation a valid measure to evaluate an ad campaign especially when buying on a CPM. Think about this happening once a week for a publisher. With 2000 subscribers and 25% reach, one reach spike (double the subscriber base) makes the weekly reach average 50%.
So what is missing when it comes to RSS metrics? A whole lot when you think about it.
New/Returning Subscribers
Just like email, the monthly number of subscribers who have opted-out and the number of opt-ins.
Attention or Readership
The number of direct subscribers (people who have added the feed to an aggregator) viewing or clicking on at least one article in 24 hours.
Day of Week and Day Part Viewing/Clicking
And mix in the publisher’s articles date and time (pubDate) to understand consumption behavior.
Extended Reach
Taking Feedburner’s current measure and differentiating when direct subscribers and non-subscribers interact with the feed’s content.
Time-Spent
This is a really big stretch especially based on how “subscribers” are counted. Most high-end web analytics packages (Omniture, Coremetrics, etc.) provide time-spent reporting. Time-spent is the best indicator of the opportunity to monetization a publisher’s content.
These are just general metrics. Two future articles will get into podcast and advertising analytics/reporting.
Added on: February 20, 2007 with feedback from 0 folks
Tagged as: attention , metrics , rss , rss metrics , syndication , time spent , web analytics ,
Add to: | |