It seems everyone is out of shape about the . Seems a little over blown and unnecessary (must have been a slow news day). People seem must upset about the timing. Yes, it seems Microsoft while they patted us on the backs. Are they trying to make sure they have a stake in RSS or the benefits? Or are they trying to protect OS level processes to remain competitive against Apple (hardware OS) and Google (web OS).
Regardless of the reason, there are three better reasons why it’s not likely to be granted:
Most patents applications don’t get granted because of . More will likely come to light so relax. And have a happy new year.
Added on: December 30, 2006 with feedback from 1 folks
Tagged as: aggregation , browsers , Microsoft , patents , platforms , rss , web aggregation ,
Add to: | |
So I’m still very confused. Aren’t you! How does work? Is it similar to but a different end audience? So the article says:
“We’re taking something consumers are already interested in…, taking quality content from that, and putting it in one place and allowing [advertisers] to sponsor it,”
Didn’t already have issues about . Or is this something similar to where the content is the ad. I can’t tell! Can you?
Updated 12/18/06 - 11:00 PM CST.... Simple is better
Are the free web-based aggregators still trying to find a revenue model? Pluck got out of the business of . Can’t blame them. They offer syncing read/un-read status across different access methods (web, desktop client, Tivo, mobile device, etc.) and attention data to help you find new content sources. Anything else? They are helping to build but IMHO the wrong brand (for another post related to local media and syndication).
So what is “Hosted Conversation”? With all capabilities of the Internet as an OS, will someone please post a graphic with the inputs, outputs, and ad insertions points. Why? Because either the writer does not understand the basics of syndication or the marketing/PR departments of the the two companies (one of the world’s largest PR firms) could not communicated and/or understand what they just launched. Thanks and I’m waiting. (NOTE: Before posting this article, I did not check either site for any other information.)
Updated 12/18/06 - 11:00 PM CST:
So it’s an web-display ad powered by an RSS feed. From a technology prospective, the ad serving guys can change the message(s) in the ad on the fly (dynamic messaging). Edelman is aggregating/mining feeds to find the “gems” about a brand so they can post into the ad. Rick Murray, president of Edelman’s social media division me2revolution, says “will not advise its clients to avoid posts that are critical of their brands”. Why doesn’t the brand start a blog, insert their latest post in the ad, and ask for comments? Seems like a simple way to start a conversation but complicated (i.e costly) may be better. So how do you stop ad comment spam?
Added on: December 18, 2006 with feedback from 7 folks
Tagged as: ads , advertising , aggregation , blogs , Edelman , feeds , monetization , Newsgator , publishers , rss ,
Add to: | |